scrambler / default rider 183 cm
Brixton Felsberg 125 vs Kawasaki 250TR ergonomics
Brixton Felsberg 125 and Kawasaki 250TR have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
Brixton Felsberg 125
All contacts reached
Kawasaki 250TR
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Brixton Felsberg 125 lists a 780 mm seat; the Kawasaki 250TR lists 775 mm — a 5 mm difference. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
On seat height alone, the Kawasaki 250TR has the easier modeled ground reach. Load your measurements into the simulator to compare the model, then verify both motorcycles in person.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Brixton Felsberg 125 | Kawasaki 250TR |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 780 mm | 775 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,320 mm | 1,420 mm |
| Wet weight | 134 kg | - |
| Displacement | 125 cc | 249 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Brixton Felsberg 125
- Sport (57.8 deg)
- Kawasaki 250TR
- Sport (58.0 deg)
Hip angle
- Brixton Felsberg 125
- Neutral (96.9 deg)
- Kawasaki 250TR
- Neutral (94.7 deg)
Elbow angle
- Brixton Felsberg 125
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Kawasaki 250TR
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Brixton Felsberg 125
- Neutral (10.1 deg)
- Kawasaki 250TR
- Neutral (11.6 deg)