Skip to content
Rider Height
<- Comparison guides

scrambler / default rider 183 cm

Brixton Felsberg 125 vs Moto Guzzi V7 III Rough ergonomics

Brixton Felsberg 125 and Moto Guzzi V7 III Rough have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.

Modeled fit comparison

Brixton Felsberg 125

Modeled scoreProvisional
95Comfortable

All contacts reached

Moto Guzzi V7 III Rough

Modeled scoreProvisional
95Comfortable

All contacts reached

The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.

Rider fit: reaching the ground

The Brixton Felsberg 125 lists a 780 mm seat; the Moto Guzzi V7 III Rough lists 770 mm — a 10 mm difference. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.

On seat height alone, the Moto Guzzi V7 III Rough has the easier modeled ground reach. Load your measurements into the simulator to compare the model, then verify both motorcycles in person.

Geometry snapshot

Geometry comparison for Brixton Felsberg 125 and Moto Guzzi V7 III Rough
SpecBrixton Felsberg 125Moto Guzzi V7 III Rough
Seat height780 mm770 mm
Wheelbase1,320 mm1,445 mm
Wet weight134 kg213 kg
Displacement125 cc744 cc

Posture metrics

Knee angle

Brixton Felsberg 125
Sport (57.8 deg)
Moto Guzzi V7 III Rough
Sport (58.0 deg)

Hip angle

Brixton Felsberg 125
Neutral (96.9 deg)
Moto Guzzi V7 III Rough
Neutral (94.2 deg)

Elbow angle

Brixton Felsberg 125
Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Moto Guzzi V7 III Rough
Relaxed (143.3 deg)

Torso lean

Brixton Felsberg 125
Neutral (10.1 deg)
Moto Guzzi V7 III Rough
Neutral (11.9 deg)