scrambler / default rider 183 cm
Brixton Felsberg 125 vs Suzuki RV125 VanVan ergonomics
Brixton Felsberg 125 and Suzuki RV125 VanVan land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
Brixton Felsberg 125
All contacts reached
Suzuki RV125 VanVan
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Brixton Felsberg 125 has a 780 mm seat; the Suzuki RV125 VanVan sits at 770 mm — a 10 mm difference. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 78 cm for the Brixton Felsberg 125 and 77 cm for the Suzuki RV125 VanVan.
That makes the Suzuki RV125 VanVan the easier reach to the ground — the safer pick for shorter riders or anyone who wants both feet planted at a stop — while the Brixton Felsberg 125 gives taller riders more legroom and a more open knee bend. Load your own height and inseam into the simulator to see exactly how each one fits you.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Brixton Felsberg 125 | Suzuki RV125 VanVan |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 780 mm | 770 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,320 mm | 1,385 mm |
| Wet weight | 134 kg | - |
| Displacement | 125 cc | 125 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Brixton Felsberg 125
- Sport (57.8 deg)
- Suzuki RV125 VanVan
- Sport (57.9 deg)
Hip angle
- Brixton Felsberg 125
- Neutral (96.9 deg)
- Suzuki RV125 VanVan
- Neutral (95.4 deg)
Elbow angle
- Brixton Felsberg 125
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Suzuki RV125 VanVan
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Brixton Felsberg 125
- Neutral (10.1 deg)
- Suzuki RV125 VanVan
- Neutral (11.1 deg)