scrambler / default rider 183 cm
Brixton Felsberg 125 vs Triumph Scrambler 900 ergonomics
Brixton Felsberg 125 and Triumph Scrambler 900 have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
Brixton Felsberg 125
All contacts reached
Triumph Scrambler 900
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Brixton Felsberg 125 lists a 780 mm seat; the Triumph Scrambler 900 lists 782 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Brixton Felsberg 125 | Triumph Scrambler 900 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 780 mm | 782 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,320 mm | 1,433 mm |
| Wet weight | 134 kg | 221 kg |
| Displacement | 125 cc | 900 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Brixton Felsberg 125
- Sport (57.8 deg)
- Triumph Scrambler 900
- Sport (58.0 deg)
Hip angle
- Brixton Felsberg 125
- Neutral (96.9 deg)
- Triumph Scrambler 900
- Neutral (94.5 deg)
Elbow angle
- Brixton Felsberg 125
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Triumph Scrambler 900
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Brixton Felsberg 125
- Neutral (10.1 deg)
- Triumph Scrambler 900
- Neutral (11.8 deg)