scrambler / default rider 183 cm
Brixton Felsberg 250 vs Honda CL160 Scrambler ergonomics
Brixton Felsberg 250 and Honda CL160 Scrambler land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
Brixton Felsberg 250
All contacts reached
Honda CL160 Scrambler
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Brixton Felsberg 250 has a 750 mm seat; the Honda CL160 Scrambler sits at 760 mm — a 10 mm difference. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 75 cm for the Brixton Felsberg 250 and 76 cm for the Honda CL160 Scrambler.
That makes the Brixton Felsberg 250 the easier reach to the ground — the safer pick for shorter riders or anyone who wants both feet planted at a stop — while the Honda CL160 Scrambler gives taller riders more legroom and a more open knee bend. Load your own height and inseam into the simulator to see exactly how each one fits you.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Brixton Felsberg 250 | Honda CL160 Scrambler |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 750 mm | 760 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,345 mm | 1,270 mm |
| Wet weight | 155 kg | 128 kg |
| Displacement | 249 cc | 161 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Brixton Felsberg 250
- Sport (57.8 deg)
- Honda CL160 Scrambler
- Sport (57.7 deg)
Hip angle
- Brixton Felsberg 250
- Neutral (96.4 deg)
- Honda CL160 Scrambler
- Neutral (98.0 deg)
Elbow angle
- Brixton Felsberg 250
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Honda CL160 Scrambler
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Brixton Felsberg 250
- Neutral (10.5 deg)
- Honda CL160 Scrambler
- Neutral (9.4 deg)