scrambler / default rider 183 cm
Brixton Felsberg 250 vs Honda CL160 Scrambler ergonomics
Brixton Felsberg 250 and Honda CL160 Scrambler have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
Brixton Felsberg 250
All contacts reached
Honda CL160 Scrambler
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Brixton Felsberg 250 lists a 750 mm seat; the Honda CL160 Scrambler lists 760 mm — a 10 mm difference. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
On seat height alone, the Brixton Felsberg 250 has the easier modeled ground reach. Load your measurements into the simulator to compare the model, then verify both motorcycles in person.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Brixton Felsberg 250 | Honda CL160 Scrambler |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 750 mm | 760 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,345 mm | 1,270 mm |
| Wet weight | 155 kg | 128 kg |
| Displacement | 249 cc | 161 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Brixton Felsberg 250
- Sport (57.8 deg)
- Honda CL160 Scrambler
- Sport (57.7 deg)
Hip angle
- Brixton Felsberg 250
- Neutral (96.4 deg)
- Honda CL160 Scrambler
- Neutral (98.0 deg)
Elbow angle
- Brixton Felsberg 250
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Honda CL160 Scrambler
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Brixton Felsberg 250
- Neutral (10.5 deg)
- Honda CL160 Scrambler
- Neutral (9.4 deg)