scrambler / default rider 183 cm
Brixton Felsberg 250 vs Moto Guzzi V7 III Rough ergonomics
Brixton Felsberg 250 and Moto Guzzi V7 III Rough have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
Brixton Felsberg 250
All contacts reached
Moto Guzzi V7 III Rough
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Brixton Felsberg 250 lists a 750 mm seat; the Moto Guzzi V7 III Rough lists 770 mm — a 20 mm difference. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
On seat height alone, the Brixton Felsberg 250 has the easier modeled ground reach. Load your measurements into the simulator to compare the model, then verify both motorcycles in person.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Brixton Felsberg 250 | Moto Guzzi V7 III Rough |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 750 mm | 770 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,345 mm | 1,445 mm |
| Wet weight | 155 kg | 213 kg |
| Displacement | 249 cc | 744 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Brixton Felsberg 250
- Sport (57.8 deg)
- Moto Guzzi V7 III Rough
- Sport (58.0 deg)
Hip angle
- Brixton Felsberg 250
- Neutral (96.4 deg)
- Moto Guzzi V7 III Rough
- Neutral (94.2 deg)
Elbow angle
- Brixton Felsberg 250
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Moto Guzzi V7 III Rough
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Brixton Felsberg 250
- Neutral (10.5 deg)
- Moto Guzzi V7 III Rough
- Neutral (11.9 deg)