sport / default rider 183 cm
Buell 1125R vs CFMoto 300SS ergonomics
Buell 1125R and CFMoto 300SS have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
Buell 1125R
All contacts reached
CFMoto 300SS
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Buell 1125R lists a 775 mm seat; the CFMoto 300SS lists 780 mm — a 5 mm difference. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
On seat height alone, the Buell 1125R has the easier modeled ground reach. Load your measurements into the simulator to compare the model, then verify both motorcycles in person.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Buell 1125R | CFMoto 300SS |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 775 mm | 780 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,375 mm | 1,364 mm |
| Wet weight | 211 kg | 165 kg |
| Displacement | 1,125 cc | 292 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Buell 1125R
- Sport (60.7 deg)
- CFMoto 300SS
- Sport (60.7 deg)
Hip angle
- Buell 1125R
- Neutral (99.5 deg)
- CFMoto 300SS
- Neutral (99.6 deg)
Elbow angle
- Buell 1125R
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- CFMoto 300SS
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Buell 1125R
- Forward (25.3 deg)
- CFMoto 300SS
- Forward (25.2 deg)