sport / default rider 183 cm
Buell 1125R vs CFMoto 300SS ergonomics
Buell 1125R and CFMoto 300SS land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
Buell 1125R
All contacts reached
CFMoto 300SS
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Buell 1125R has a 775 mm seat; the CFMoto 300SS sits at 780 mm — a 5 mm difference. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 78 cm for the Buell 1125R and 78 cm for the CFMoto 300SS.
That makes the Buell 1125R the easier reach to the ground — the safer pick for shorter riders or anyone who wants both feet planted at a stop — while the CFMoto 300SS gives taller riders more legroom and a more open knee bend. Load your own height and inseam into the simulator to see exactly how each one fits you.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Buell 1125R | CFMoto 300SS |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 775 mm | 780 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,375 mm | 1,364 mm |
| Wet weight | 211 kg | 165 kg |
| Displacement | 1,125 cc | 292 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Buell 1125R
- Sport (60.7 deg)
- CFMoto 300SS
- Sport (60.7 deg)
Hip angle
- Buell 1125R
- Neutral (99.5 deg)
- CFMoto 300SS
- Neutral (99.6 deg)
Elbow angle
- Buell 1125R
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- CFMoto 300SS
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Buell 1125R
- Forward (25.3 deg)
- CFMoto 300SS
- Forward (25.2 deg)