sport-touring / default rider 183 cm
Buell S3T Thunderbolt vs Suzuki SV650S ergonomics
Buell S3T Thunderbolt and Suzuki SV650S land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
Buell S3T Thunderbolt
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
Suzuki SV650S
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Buell S3T Thunderbolt has a 800 mm seat; the Suzuki SV650S sits at 800 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 80 cm for the Buell S3T Thunderbolt and 80 cm for the Suzuki SV650S.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Buell S3T Thunderbolt | Suzuki SV650S |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 800 mm | 800 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,397 mm | 1,420 mm |
| Wet weight | 233 kg | 189 kg |
| Displacement | 1,203 cc | 645 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Buell S3T Thunderbolt
- Sport (57.7 deg)
- Suzuki SV650S
- Sport (57.8 deg)
Hip angle
- Buell S3T Thunderbolt
- Neutral (91.7 deg)
- Suzuki SV650S
- Neutral (91.2 deg)
Elbow angle
- Buell S3T Thunderbolt
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Suzuki SV650S
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Buell S3T Thunderbolt
- Neutral (12.5 deg)
- Suzuki SV650S
- Neutral (12.8 deg)