adventure / default rider 183 cm
Buell Ulysses XB12X vs Triumph Tiger 1050 ergonomics
Buell Ulysses XB12X and Triumph Tiger 1050 land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
Buell Ulysses XB12X
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
Triumph Tiger 1050
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Buell Ulysses XB12X | Triumph Tiger 1050 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 836 mm | 836 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,372 mm | 1,509 mm |
| Wet weight | - | - |
| Displacement | 1,203 cc | 1,050 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Buell Ulysses XB12X
- Sport (65.3 deg)
- Triumph Tiger 1050
- Sport (65.5 deg)
Hip angle
- Buell Ulysses XB12X
- Neutral (103.6 deg)
- Triumph Tiger 1050
- Neutral (100.7 deg)
Elbow angle
- Buell Ulysses XB12X
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Triumph Tiger 1050
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Buell Ulysses XB12X
- Neutral (8.0 deg)
- Triumph Tiger 1050
- Neutral (10.0 deg)