Skip to content
Rider Height
<- Comparison guides

three-wheeler / default rider 183 cm

Can-Am Ryker 900 ACE vs Can-Am Ryker 900 ACE ergonomics

Can-Am Ryker 900 ACE and Can-Am Ryker 900 ACE land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.

Fit verdict

Can-Am Ryker 900 ACE

95Comfortable

All contacts reached

Can-Am Ryker 900 ACE

95Comfortable

All contacts reached

The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.

Rider fit: reaching the ground

The Can-Am Ryker 900 ACE has a 597 mm seat; the Can-Am Ryker 900 ACE sits at 597 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 60 cm for the Can-Am Ryker 900 ACE and 60 cm for the Can-Am Ryker 900 ACE.

Geometry snapshot

Geometry comparison for Can-Am Ryker 900 ACE and Can-Am Ryker 900 ACE
SpecCan-Am Ryker 900 ACECan-Am Ryker 900 ACE
Seat height597 mm597 mm
Wheelbase1,709 mm1,709 mm
Wet weight--
Displacement900 cc900 cc

Posture metrics

Knee angle

Can-Am Ryker 900 ACE
Sport (58.7 deg)
Can-Am Ryker 900 ACE
Sport (58.7 deg)

Hip angle

Can-Am Ryker 900 ACE
Neutral (88.5 deg)
Can-Am Ryker 900 ACE
Neutral (88.5 deg)

Elbow angle

Can-Am Ryker 900 ACE
Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Can-Am Ryker 900 ACE
Relaxed (143.3 deg)

Torso lean

Can-Am Ryker 900 ACE
Neutral (15.7 deg)
Can-Am Ryker 900 ACE
Neutral (15.7 deg)