three-wheeler / default rider 183 cm
Can-Am Spyder F3-S vs Can-Am Spyder F3-T ergonomics
Can-Am Spyder F3-S and Can-Am Spyder F3-T land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
Can-Am Spyder F3-S
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
Can-Am Spyder F3-T
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Can-Am Spyder F3-S | Can-Am Spyder F3-T |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 675 mm | 676 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,709 mm | 1,709 mm |
| Wet weight | - | 450 kg |
| Displacement | 1,330 cc | 1,330 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Can-Am Spyder F3-S
- Sport (58.7 deg)
- Can-Am Spyder F3-T
- Sport (58.7 deg)
Hip angle
- Can-Am Spyder F3-S
- Neutral (88.5 deg)
- Can-Am Spyder F3-T
- Neutral (88.5 deg)
Elbow angle
- Can-Am Spyder F3-S
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Can-Am Spyder F3-T
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Can-Am Spyder F3-S
- Neutral (15.7 deg)
- Can-Am Spyder F3-T
- Neutral (15.7 deg)