adventure / default rider 183 cm
CFMoto Ibex 450 vs QJ Motor SVT 650 ergonomics
CFMoto Ibex 450 and QJ Motor SVT 650 have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
CFMoto Ibex 450
All contacts reached
QJ Motor SVT 650
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The CFMoto Ibex 450 lists a 800 mm seat; the QJ Motor SVT 650 lists 795 mm — a 5 mm difference. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
On seat height alone, the QJ Motor SVT 650 has the easier modeled ground reach. Load your measurements into the simulator to compare the model, then verify both motorcycles in person.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | CFMoto Ibex 450 | QJ Motor SVT 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 800 mm | 795 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,505 mm | 1,505 mm |
| Wet weight | 193 kg | 236 kg |
| Displacement | 449 cc | 645 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- CFMoto Ibex 450
- Sport (65.5 deg)
- QJ Motor SVT 650
- Sport (65.5 deg)
Hip angle
- CFMoto Ibex 450
- Neutral (100.7 deg)
- QJ Motor SVT 650
- Neutral (100.7 deg)
Elbow angle
- CFMoto Ibex 450
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- QJ Motor SVT 650
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- CFMoto Ibex 450
- Neutral (10.0 deg)
- QJ Motor SVT 650
- Neutral (10.0 deg)