motocross / default rider 183 cm
CZ 400 MX Type 981 vs Husqvarna Motorcycles TC 85 17/14 ergonomics
CZ 400 MX Type 981 and Husqvarna Motorcycles TC 85 17/14 land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
CZ 400 MX Type 981
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
Husqvarna Motorcycles TC 85 17/14
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | CZ 400 MX Type 981 | Husqvarna Motorcycles TC 85 17/14 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 836 mm | 845 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,390 mm | 1,282 mm |
| Wet weight | - | - |
| Displacement | 400 cc | 85 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- CZ 400 MX Type 981
- Sport (57.9 deg)
- Husqvarna Motorcycles TC 85 17/14
- Sport (57.7 deg)
Hip angle
- CZ 400 MX Type 981
- Neutral (95.4 deg)
- Husqvarna Motorcycles TC 85 17/14
- Neutral (97.7 deg)
Elbow angle
- CZ 400 MX Type 981
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Husqvarna Motorcycles TC 85 17/14
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- CZ 400 MX Type 981
- Neutral (11.1 deg)
- Husqvarna Motorcycles TC 85 17/14
- Neutral (9.5 deg)