electric / default rider 183 cm
Energica Ego vs Super Soco TSx ergonomics
Energica Ego and Super Soco TSx have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
Energica Ego
All contacts reached
Super Soco TSx
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Energica Ego lists a 810 mm seat; the Super Soco TSx lists 810 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Energica Ego | Super Soco TSx |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 810 mm | 810 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,465 mm | 1,320 mm |
| Wet weight | 280 kg | - |
| Displacement | - | - |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Energica Ego
- Sport (58.1 deg)
- Super Soco TSx
- Sport (57.8 deg)
Hip angle
- Energica Ego
- Neutral (93.8 deg)
- Super Soco TSx
- Neutral (96.9 deg)
Elbow angle
- Energica Ego
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Super Soco TSx
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Energica Ego
- Neutral (12.2 deg)
- Super Soco TSx
- Neutral (10.1 deg)