electric / default rider 183 cm
Energica Eva EsseEsse9 vs KYMCO F9 ergonomics
Energica Eva EsseEsse9 and KYMCO F9 land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
Energica Eva EsseEsse9
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
KYMCO F9
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Energica Eva EsseEsse9 has a 790 mm seat; the KYMCO F9 sits at 790 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 79 cm for the Energica Eva EsseEsse9 and 79 cm for the KYMCO F9.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Energica Eva EsseEsse9 | KYMCO F9 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 790 mm | 790 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,465 mm | 1,236 mm |
| Wet weight | 260 kg | 107 kg |
| Displacement | - | - |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Energica Eva EsseEsse9
- Sport (58.1 deg)
- KYMCO F9
- Sport (57.6 deg)
Hip angle
- Energica Eva EsseEsse9
- Neutral (93.8 deg)
- KYMCO F9
- Neutral (98.8 deg)
Elbow angle
- Energica Eva EsseEsse9
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- KYMCO F9
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Energica Eva EsseEsse9
- Neutral (12.2 deg)
- KYMCO F9
- Neutral (8.8 deg)