scrambler / default rider 183 cm
Fantic Caballero Flat Track 500 vs SWM Six6 500 ergonomics
Fantic Caballero Flat Track 500 and SWM Six6 500 land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
Fantic Caballero Flat Track 500
All contacts reached
SWM Six6 500
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Fantic Caballero Flat Track 500 has a 840 mm seat; the SWM Six6 500 sits at 845 mm — a 5 mm difference. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 84 cm for the Fantic Caballero Flat Track 500 and 85 cm for the SWM Six6 500.
That makes the Fantic Caballero Flat Track 500 the easier reach to the ground — the safer pick for shorter riders or anyone who wants both feet planted at a stop — while the SWM Six6 500 gives taller riders more legroom and a more open knee bend. Load your own height and inseam into the simulator to see exactly how each one fits you.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Fantic Caballero Flat Track 500 | SWM Six6 500 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 840 mm | 845 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,425 mm | 1,485 mm |
| Wet weight | - | - |
| Displacement | 449 cc | 445 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Fantic Caballero Flat Track 500
- Sport (58.0 deg)
- SWM Six6 500
- Sport (58.1 deg)
Hip angle
- Fantic Caballero Flat Track 500
- Neutral (94.6 deg)
- SWM Six6 500
- Neutral (93.2 deg)
Elbow angle
- Fantic Caballero Flat Track 500
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- SWM Six6 500
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Fantic Caballero Flat Track 500
- Neutral (11.7 deg)
- SWM Six6 500
- Neutral (12.5 deg)