supermoto / default rider 183 cm
Fantic XM 50 Performance vs Fantic XMF 125 Performance ergonomics
Fantic XM 50 Performance and Fantic XMF 125 Performance have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
Fantic XM 50 Performance
All contacts reached
Fantic XMF 125 Performance
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Fantic XM 50 Performance lists a 870 mm seat; the Fantic XMF 125 Performance lists 870 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Fantic XM 50 Performance | Fantic XMF 125 Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 870 mm | 870 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,435 mm | 1,435 mm |
| Wet weight | - | 127 kg |
| Displacement | 50 cc | 125 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Fantic XM 50 Performance
- Sport (58.0 deg)
- Fantic XMF 125 Performance
- Sport (58.0 deg)
Hip angle
- Fantic XM 50 Performance
- Neutral (94.3 deg)
- Fantic XMF 125 Performance
- Neutral (94.3 deg)
Elbow angle
- Fantic XM 50 Performance
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Fantic XMF 125 Performance
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Fantic XM 50 Performance
- Neutral (11.8 deg)
- Fantic XMF 125 Performance
- Neutral (11.8 deg)