supermoto / default rider 183 cm
Fantic XM 50 Performance vs Husqvarna Motorcycles SM 125 S ergonomics
Fantic XM 50 Performance and Husqvarna Motorcycles SM 125 S land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
Fantic XM 50 Performance
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
Husqvarna Motorcycles SM 125 S
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Fantic XM 50 Performance | Husqvarna Motorcycles SM 125 S |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 870 mm | 870 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,435 mm | 1,470 mm |
| Wet weight | - | - |
| Displacement | 50 cc | 125 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Fantic XM 50 Performance
- Sport (58.0 deg)
- Husqvarna Motorcycles SM 125 S
- Sport (58.1 deg)
Hip angle
- Fantic XM 50 Performance
- Neutral (94.3 deg)
- Husqvarna Motorcycles SM 125 S
- Neutral (93.6 deg)
Elbow angle
- Fantic XM 50 Performance
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Husqvarna Motorcycles SM 125 S
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Fantic XM 50 Performance
- Neutral (11.8 deg)
- Husqvarna Motorcycles SM 125 S
- Neutral (12.3 deg)