supermoto / default rider 183 cm
Fantic XMF 125 Performance vs Husaberg FS650E ergonomics
Fantic XMF 125 Performance and Husaberg FS650E have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
Fantic XMF 125 Performance
All contacts reached
Husaberg FS650E
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Fantic XMF 125 Performance lists a 870 mm seat; the Husaberg FS650E lists 870 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Fantic XMF 125 Performance | Husaberg FS650E |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 870 mm | 870 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,435 mm | 1,490 mm |
| Wet weight | 127 kg | - |
| Displacement | 125 cc | 628 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Fantic XMF 125 Performance
- Sport (58.0 deg)
- Husaberg FS650E
- Sport (58.1 deg)
Hip angle
- Fantic XMF 125 Performance
- Neutral (94.3 deg)
- Husaberg FS650E
- Neutral (93.2 deg)
Elbow angle
- Fantic XMF 125 Performance
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Husaberg FS650E
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Fantic XMF 125 Performance
- Neutral (11.8 deg)
- Husaberg FS650E
- Neutral (12.6 deg)