supermoto / default rider 183 cm
Fantic XMF 125 Performance vs Rieju MRT 125 SM AC ergonomics
Fantic XMF 125 Performance and Rieju MRT 125 SM AC land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
Fantic XMF 125 Performance
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
Rieju MRT 125 SM AC
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Fantic XMF 125 Performance | Rieju MRT 125 SM AC |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 870 mm | 870 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,435 mm | 1,380 mm |
| Wet weight | 127 kg | - |
| Displacement | 125 cc | 125 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Fantic XMF 125 Performance
- Sport (58.0 deg)
- Rieju MRT 125 SM AC
- Sport (57.9 deg)
Hip angle
- Fantic XMF 125 Performance
- Neutral (94.3 deg)
- Rieju MRT 125 SM AC
- Neutral (95.5 deg)
Elbow angle
- Fantic XMF 125 Performance
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Rieju MRT 125 SM AC
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Fantic XMF 125 Performance
- Neutral (11.8 deg)
- Rieju MRT 125 SM AC
- Neutral (11.0 deg)