cafe-racer / default rider 183 cm
FB Mondial HPS 250 Hipster vs Triumph Bonneville T120 Ace ergonomics
FB Mondial HPS 250 Hipster and Triumph Bonneville T120 Ace land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
FB Mondial HPS 250 Hipster
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
Triumph Bonneville T120 Ace
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The FB Mondial HPS 250 Hipster has a 785 mm seat; the Triumph Bonneville T120 Ace sits at 785 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 79 cm for the FB Mondial HPS 250 Hipster and 79 cm for the Triumph Bonneville T120 Ace.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | FB Mondial HPS 250 Hipster | Triumph Bonneville T120 Ace |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 785 mm | 785 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,369 mm | 1,445 mm |
| Wet weight | 141 kg | - |
| Displacement | 249 cc | 1,200 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- FB Mondial HPS 250 Hipster
- Sport (57.9 deg)
- Triumph Bonneville T120 Ace
- Sport (58.0 deg)
Hip angle
- FB Mondial HPS 250 Hipster
- Neutral (95.8 deg)
- Triumph Bonneville T120 Ace
- Neutral (94.3 deg)
Elbow angle
- FB Mondial HPS 250 Hipster
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Triumph Bonneville T120 Ace
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- FB Mondial HPS 250 Hipster
- Neutral (10.8 deg)
- Triumph Bonneville T120 Ace
- Neutral (11.8 deg)