Skip to content
Rider Height
<- Comparison guides

enduro / default rider 183 cm

GasGas EC 300 vs KTM 300 XC TPI ergonomics

GasGas EC 300 and KTM 300 XC TPI have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.

Modeled fit comparison

GasGas EC 300

Modeled scoreProvisional
95Comfortable

All contacts reached

KTM 300 XC TPI

Modeled scoreProvisional
95Comfortable

All contacts reached

The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.

Rider fit: reaching the ground

The GasGas EC 300 lists a 950 mm seat; the KTM 300 XC TPI lists 950 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.

Geometry snapshot

Geometry comparison for GasGas EC 300 and KTM 300 XC TPI
SpecGasGas EC 300KTM 300 XC TPI
Seat height950 mm950 mm
Wheelbase1,483 mm1,486 mm
Wet weight--
Displacement299 cc300 cc

Posture metrics

Knee angle

GasGas EC 300
Sport (58.1 deg)
KTM 300 XC TPI
Sport (58.1 deg)

Hip angle

GasGas EC 300
Neutral (93.4 deg)
KTM 300 XC TPI
Neutral (93.2 deg)

Elbow angle

GasGas EC 300
Relaxed (143.3 deg)
KTM 300 XC TPI
Relaxed (143.3 deg)

Torso lean

GasGas EC 300
Neutral (12.5 deg)
KTM 300 XC TPI
Neutral (12.5 deg)