Skip to content
Rider Height
<- Comparison guides

motocross / default rider 183 cm

GasGas MC 50 vs GasGas MC 65 ergonomics

GasGas MC 50 and GasGas MC 65 land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.

Fit verdict

GasGas MC 50

95Comfortable

All contacts reached

GasGas MC 65

95Comfortable

All contacts reached

The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.

Rider fit: reaching the ground

The GasGas MC 50 has a 653 mm seat; the GasGas MC 65 sits at 730 mm — a 77 mm difference. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 65 cm for the GasGas MC 50 and 73 cm for the GasGas MC 65.

That makes the GasGas MC 50 the easier reach to the ground — the safer pick for shorter riders or anyone who wants both feet planted at a stop — while the GasGas MC 65 gives taller riders more legroom and a more open knee bend. Load your own height and inseam into the simulator to see exactly how each one fits you.

Geometry snapshot

Geometry comparison for GasGas MC 50 and GasGas MC 65
SpecGasGas MC 50GasGas MC 65
Seat height653 mm730 mm
Wheelbase1,026 mm1,142 mm
Wet weight--
Displacement50 cc65 cc

Posture metrics

Knee angle

GasGas MC 50
Sport (57.2 deg)
GasGas MC 65
Sport (57.4 deg)

Hip angle

GasGas MC 50
Neutral (103.7 deg)
GasGas MC 65
Neutral (100.9 deg)

Elbow angle

GasGas MC 50
Relaxed (143.3 deg)
GasGas MC 65
Relaxed (143.3 deg)

Torso lean

GasGas MC 50
Neutral (5.5 deg)
GasGas MC 65
Neutral (7.4 deg)