cruiser / default rider 183 cm
Harley-Davidson Fat Bob 114 vs Keeway V-Cruise ergonomics
Keeway V-Cruise scores 95 vs 92 for the default rider, making it the stronger ergonomic fit than Harley-Davidson Fat Bob 114 in this comparison.
Fit verdict
Harley-Davidson Fat Bob 114
92Comfortable
All contacts reached
Keeway V-Cruise
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
Keeway V-Cruise has the stronger default-rider fit in this generated comparison.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Harley-Davidson Fat Bob 114 | Keeway V-Cruise |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 710 mm | 710 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,615 mm | 1,345 mm |
| Wet weight | 306 kg | - |
| Displacement | 1,868 cc | 125 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Harley-Davidson Fat Bob 114
- Open (117.8 deg)
- Keeway V-Cruise
- Neutral (97.3 deg)
Hip angle
- Harley-Davidson Fat Bob 114
- Sport (79.5 deg)
- Keeway V-Cruise
- Sport (78.3 deg)
Elbow angle
- Harley-Davidson Fat Bob 114
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Keeway V-Cruise
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Harley-Davidson Fat Bob 114
- Neutral (9.7 deg)
- Keeway V-Cruise
- Neutral (5.3 deg)