scooter / default rider 183 cm
Hero MotoCorp Xoom 160 vs Yamaha Zuma 125 ergonomics
Hero MotoCorp Xoom 160 and Yamaha Zuma 125 have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
Hero MotoCorp Xoom 160
All contacts reached
Yamaha Zuma 125
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Hero MotoCorp Xoom 160 lists a 787 mm seat; the Yamaha Zuma 125 lists 785 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Hero MotoCorp Xoom 160 | Yamaha Zuma 125 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 787 mm | 785 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,348 mm | 1,341 mm |
| Wet weight | 142 kg | 128 kg |
| Displacement | 156 cc | 125 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Hero MotoCorp Xoom 160
- Sport (57.8 deg)
- Yamaha Zuma 125
- Sport (57.8 deg)
Hip angle
- Hero MotoCorp Xoom 160
- Neutral (96.2 deg)
- Yamaha Zuma 125
- Neutral (96.5 deg)
Elbow angle
- Hero MotoCorp Xoom 160
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Yamaha Zuma 125
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Hero MotoCorp Xoom 160
- Neutral (10.5 deg)
- Yamaha Zuma 125
- Neutral (10.4 deg)