adventure / default rider 183 cm
Honda Africa Twin Adventure Sports ES vs QJ Motor SRT 900 SX ergonomics
Honda Africa Twin Adventure Sports ES and QJ Motor SRT 900 SX land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
Honda Africa Twin Adventure Sports ES
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
QJ Motor SRT 900 SX
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Honda Africa Twin Adventure Sports ES has a 836 mm seat; the QJ Motor SRT 900 SX sits at 835 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 84 cm for the Honda Africa Twin Adventure Sports ES and 84 cm for the QJ Motor SRT 900 SX.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Honda Africa Twin Adventure Sports ES | QJ Motor SRT 900 SX |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 836 mm | 835 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,570 mm | 1,540 mm |
| Wet weight | 243 kg | 264 kg |
| Displacement | 1,084 cc | 904 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Honda Africa Twin Adventure Sports ES
- Sport (65.7 deg)
- QJ Motor SRT 900 SX
- Sport (65.6 deg)
Hip angle
- Honda Africa Twin Adventure Sports ES
- Neutral (99.3 deg)
- QJ Motor SRT 900 SX
- Neutral (100.0 deg)
Elbow angle
- Honda Africa Twin Adventure Sports ES
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- QJ Motor SRT 900 SX
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Honda Africa Twin Adventure Sports ES
- Neutral (10.9 deg)
- QJ Motor SRT 900 SX
- Neutral (10.5 deg)