naked / default rider 183 cm
Honda CB300F vs Honda Hornet 600 ergonomics
Honda CB300F and Honda Hornet 600 have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
Honda CB300F
All contacts reached
Honda Hornet 600
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Honda CB300F lists a 789 mm seat; the Honda Hornet 600 lists 790 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Honda CB300F | Honda Hornet 600 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 789 mm | 790 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,404 mm | 1,426 mm |
| Wet weight | 144 kg | - |
| Displacement | 286 cc | 599 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Honda CB300F
- Sport (61.5 deg)
- Honda Hornet 600
- Sport (61.6 deg)
Hip angle
- Honda CB300F
- Neutral (92.6 deg)
- Honda Hornet 600
- Neutral (92.1 deg)
Elbow angle
- Honda CB300F
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Honda Hornet 600
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Honda CB300F
- Neutral (12.1 deg)
- Honda Hornet 600
- Neutral (12.5 deg)