standard / default rider 183 cm
Honda CB350F vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350 ergonomics
Honda CB350F and Royal Enfield Hunter 350 land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
Honda CB350F
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Honda CB350F has a 790 mm seat; the Royal Enfield Hunter 350 sits at 790 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 79 cm for the Honda CB350F and 79 cm for the Royal Enfield Hunter 350.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Honda CB350F | Royal Enfield Hunter 350 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 790 mm | 790 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,350 mm | 1,370 mm |
| Wet weight | - | 177 kg |
| Displacement | 347 cc | 349 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Honda CB350F
- Sport (57.8 deg)
- Royal Enfield Hunter 350
- Sport (57.9 deg)
Hip angle
- Honda CB350F
- Neutral (96.2 deg)
- Royal Enfield Hunter 350
- Neutral (95.8 deg)
Elbow angle
- Honda CB350F
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Royal Enfield Hunter 350
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Honda CB350F
- Neutral (10.6 deg)
- Royal Enfield Hunter 350
- Neutral (10.9 deg)