scrambler / default rider 183 cm
Honda CL160 Scrambler vs Moto Guzzi V7 III Rough ergonomics
Honda CL160 Scrambler and Moto Guzzi V7 III Rough land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
Honda CL160 Scrambler
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
Moto Guzzi V7 III Rough
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Honda CL160 Scrambler | Moto Guzzi V7 III Rough |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 760 mm | 770 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,270 mm | 1,445 mm |
| Wet weight | 128 kg | 213 kg |
| Displacement | 161 cc | 744 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Honda CL160 Scrambler
- Sport (57.7 deg)
- Moto Guzzi V7 III Rough
- Sport (58.0 deg)
Hip angle
- Honda CL160 Scrambler
- Neutral (98.0 deg)
- Moto Guzzi V7 III Rough
- Neutral (94.2 deg)
Elbow angle
- Honda CL160 Scrambler
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Moto Guzzi V7 III Rough
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Honda CL160 Scrambler
- Neutral (9.4 deg)
- Moto Guzzi V7 III Rough
- Neutral (11.9 deg)