enduro / default rider 183 cm
Honda CRF230F vs Suzuki TS200R ergonomics
Honda CRF230F and Suzuki TS200R have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
Honda CRF230F
All contacts reached
Suzuki TS200R
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Honda CRF230F lists a 879 mm seat; the Suzuki TS200R lists 879 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Honda CRF230F | Suzuki TS200R |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 879 mm | 879 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,372 mm | 1,425 mm |
| Wet weight | 112 kg | 122 kg |
| Displacement | 223 cc | 195 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Honda CRF230F
- Sport (57.9 deg)
- Suzuki TS200R
- Sport (58.0 deg)
Hip angle
- Honda CRF230F
- Neutral (95.7 deg)
- Suzuki TS200R
- Neutral (94.6 deg)
Elbow angle
- Honda CRF230F
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Suzuki TS200R
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Honda CRF230F
- Neutral (10.9 deg)
- Suzuki TS200R
- Neutral (11.7 deg)