enduro / default rider 183 cm
Honda CRF250F vs Suzuki TS200R ergonomics
Honda CRF250F and Suzuki TS200R have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
Honda CRF250F
All contacts reached
Suzuki TS200R
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Honda CRF250F lists a 884 mm seat; the Suzuki TS200R lists 879 mm — a 5 mm difference. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
On seat height alone, the Suzuki TS200R has the easier modeled ground reach. Load your measurements into the simulator to compare the model, then verify both motorcycles in person.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Honda CRF250F | Suzuki TS200R |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 884 mm | 879 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,420 mm | 1,425 mm |
| Wet weight | 120 kg | 122 kg |
| Displacement | 249 cc | 195 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Honda CRF250F
- Sport (58.0 deg)
- Suzuki TS200R
- Sport (58.0 deg)
Hip angle
- Honda CRF250F
- Neutral (94.7 deg)
- Suzuki TS200R
- Neutral (94.6 deg)
Elbow angle
- Honda CRF250F
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Suzuki TS200R
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Honda CRF250F
- Neutral (11.6 deg)
- Suzuki TS200R
- Neutral (11.7 deg)