cruiser / default rider 183 cm
Honda Fury vs Kawasaki Vulcan 900 Classic ergonomics
Kawasaki Vulcan 900 Classic scores 92 vs 72 for the default rider, making it the stronger ergonomic fit than Honda Fury in this comparison.
Fit verdict
Honda Fury
72Usable
All contacts reached
Kawasaki Vulcan 900 Classic
92Comfortable
All contacts reached
Kawasaki Vulcan 900 Classic has the stronger default-rider fit in this generated comparison.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Honda Fury has a 678 mm seat; the Kawasaki Vulcan 900 Classic sits at 680 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 68 cm for the Honda Fury and 68 cm for the Kawasaki Vulcan 900 Classic.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Honda Fury | Kawasaki Vulcan 900 Classic |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 678 mm | 680 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,803 mm | 1,645 mm |
| Wet weight | 306 kg | 281 kg |
| Displacement | 1,312 cc | 903 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Honda Fury
- Stretched (137.3 deg)
- Kawasaki Vulcan 900 Classic
- Open (120.3 deg)
Hip angle
- Honda Fury
- Sport (83.8 deg)
- Kawasaki Vulcan 900 Classic
- Sport (79.9 deg)
Elbow angle
- Honda Fury
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Kawasaki Vulcan 900 Classic
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Honda Fury
- Neutral (12.6 deg)
- Kawasaki Vulcan 900 Classic
- Neutral (10.2 deg)