sport-touring / default rider 183 cm
Honda NT700V vs Suzuki RF900R ergonomics
Honda NT700V and Suzuki RF900R have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
Honda NT700V
All contacts reached
Suzuki RF900R
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Honda NT700V lists a 806 mm seat; the Suzuki RF900R lists 805 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Honda NT700V | Suzuki RF900R |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 806 mm | 805 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,475 mm | 1,440 mm |
| Wet weight | 257 kg | - |
| Displacement | 680 cc | 937 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Honda NT700V
- Sport (57.9 deg)
- Suzuki RF900R
- Sport (57.8 deg)
Hip angle
- Honda NT700V
- Neutral (90.1 deg)
- Suzuki RF900R
- Neutral (90.8 deg)
Elbow angle
- Honda NT700V
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Suzuki RF900R
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Honda NT700V
- Neutral (13.4 deg)
- Suzuki RF900R
- Neutral (13.0 deg)