sport-touring / default rider 183 cm
Honda NT700V vs Suzuki RF900R ergonomics
Honda NT700V and Suzuki RF900R land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
Honda NT700V
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
Suzuki RF900R
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Honda NT700V has a 806 mm seat; the Suzuki RF900R sits at 805 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 81 cm for the Honda NT700V and 81 cm for the Suzuki RF900R.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Honda NT700V | Suzuki RF900R |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 806 mm | 805 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,475 mm | 1,440 mm |
| Wet weight | 257 kg | - |
| Displacement | 680 cc | 937 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Honda NT700V
- Sport (57.9 deg)
- Suzuki RF900R
- Sport (57.8 deg)
Hip angle
- Honda NT700V
- Neutral (90.1 deg)
- Suzuki RF900R
- Neutral (90.8 deg)
Elbow angle
- Honda NT700V
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Suzuki RF900R
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Honda NT700V
- Neutral (13.4 deg)
- Suzuki RF900R
- Neutral (13.0 deg)