scooter / default rider 183 cm
Honda Ruckus vs Suzuki AN 200 Burgman ergonomics
Honda Ruckus and Suzuki AN 200 Burgman land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
Honda Ruckus
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
Suzuki AN 200 Burgman
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Honda Ruckus has a 734 mm seat; the Suzuki AN 200 Burgman sits at 735 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 73 cm for the Honda Ruckus and 74 cm for the Suzuki AN 200 Burgman.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Honda Ruckus | Suzuki AN 200 Burgman |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 734 mm | 735 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,265 mm | 1,465 mm |
| Wet weight | 88 kg | 160 kg |
| Displacement | 49 cc | 200 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Honda Ruckus
- Sport (57.6 deg)
- Suzuki AN 200 Burgman
- Sport (58.1 deg)
Hip angle
- Honda Ruckus
- Neutral (98.3 deg)
- Suzuki AN 200 Burgman
- Neutral (93.8 deg)
Elbow angle
- Honda Ruckus
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Suzuki AN 200 Burgman
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Honda Ruckus
- Neutral (9.2 deg)
- Suzuki AN 200 Burgman
- Neutral (12.2 deg)