Skip to content
Rider Height
<- Comparison guides

adventure / default rider 183 cm

Honda Transalp E-Clutch vs KTM 390 Adventure ergonomics

Honda Transalp E-Clutch and KTM 390 Adventure have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.

Modeled fit comparison

Honda Transalp E-Clutch

Modeled scoreProvisional
95Comfortable

All contacts reached

KTM 390 Adventure

Modeled scoreProvisional
95Comfortable

All contacts reached

The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.

Rider fit: reaching the ground

The Honda Transalp E-Clutch lists a 856 mm seat; the KTM 390 Adventure lists 855 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.

Geometry snapshot

Geometry comparison for Honda Transalp E-Clutch and KTM 390 Adventure
SpecHonda Transalp E-ClutchKTM 390 Adventure
Seat height856 mm855 mm
Wheelbase1,562 mm1,430 mm
Wet weight212 kg-
Displacement755 cc373 cc

Posture metrics

Knee angle

Honda Transalp E-Clutch
Sport (65.7 deg)
KTM 390 Adventure
Sport (65.4 deg)

Hip angle

Honda Transalp E-Clutch
Neutral (99.5 deg)
KTM 390 Adventure
Neutral (102.3 deg)

Elbow angle

Honda Transalp E-Clutch
Relaxed (143.3 deg)
KTM 390 Adventure
Relaxed (143.3 deg)

Torso lean

Honda Transalp E-Clutch
Neutral (10.8 deg)
KTM 390 Adventure
Neutral (8.8 deg)