enduro / default rider 183 cm
Honda XR400R vs Rieju MR Ranger 300 ergonomics
Honda XR400R and Rieju MR Ranger 300 have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
Honda XR400R
All contacts reached
Rieju MR Ranger 300
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Honda XR400R lists a 930 mm seat; the Rieju MR Ranger 300 lists 928 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Honda XR400R | Rieju MR Ranger 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 930 mm | 928 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,425 mm | 1,480 mm |
| Wet weight | - | - |
| Displacement | 397 cc | 299 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Honda XR400R
- Sport (58.0 deg)
- Rieju MR Ranger 300
- Sport (58.1 deg)
Hip angle
- Honda XR400R
- Neutral (94.6 deg)
- Rieju MR Ranger 300
- Neutral (93.3 deg)
Elbow angle
- Honda XR400R
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Rieju MR Ranger 300
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Honda XR400R
- Neutral (11.7 deg)
- Rieju MR Ranger 300
- Neutral (12.5 deg)