electric / default rider 183 cm
Horwin CR6 vs NIU XQi3 Street ergonomics
Horwin CR6 and NIU XQi3 Street land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
Horwin CR6
All contacts reached
NIU XQi3 Street
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Horwin CR6 has a 870 mm seat; the NIU XQi3 Street sits at 875 mm — a 5 mm difference. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 87 cm for the Horwin CR6 and 88 cm for the NIU XQi3 Street.
That makes the Horwin CR6 the easier reach to the ground — the safer pick for shorter riders or anyone who wants both feet planted at a stop — while the NIU XQi3 Street gives taller riders more legroom and a more open knee bend. Load your own height and inseam into the simulator to see exactly how each one fits you.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Horwin CR6 | NIU XQi3 Street |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 870 mm | 875 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,395 mm | 1,270 mm |
| Wet weight | - | 76 kg |
| Displacement | - | - |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Horwin CR6
- Sport (57.9 deg)
- NIU XQi3 Street
- Sport (57.7 deg)
Hip angle
- Horwin CR6
- Neutral (95.3 deg)
- NIU XQi3 Street
- Neutral (98.0 deg)
Elbow angle
- Horwin CR6
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- NIU XQi3 Street
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Horwin CR6
- Neutral (11.2 deg)
- NIU XQi3 Street
- Neutral (9.4 deg)