electric / default rider 183 cm
Horwin EK1 vs Simple Energy One Gen 2 ergonomics
Horwin EK1 and Simple Energy One Gen 2 have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
Horwin EK1
All contacts reached
Simple Energy One Gen 2
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Horwin EK1 lists a 780 mm seat; the Simple Energy One Gen 2 lists 780 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Horwin EK1 | Simple Energy One Gen 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 780 mm | 780 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,310 mm | 1,335 mm |
| Wet weight | - | 129 kg |
| Displacement | - | - |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Horwin EK1
- Sport (57.8 deg)
- Simple Energy One Gen 2
- Sport (57.8 deg)
Hip angle
- Horwin EK1
- Neutral (97.0 deg)
- Simple Energy One Gen 2
- Neutral (96.5 deg)
Elbow angle
- Horwin EK1
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Simple Energy One Gen 2
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Horwin EK1
- Neutral (10.0 deg)
- Simple Energy One Gen 2
- Neutral (10.3 deg)