electric / default rider 183 cm
Horwin EK1 vs Simple Energy One Gen 2 ergonomics
Horwin EK1 and Simple Energy One Gen 2 land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
Horwin EK1
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
Simple Energy One Gen 2
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Horwin EK1 has a 780 mm seat; the Simple Energy One Gen 2 sits at 780 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 78 cm for the Horwin EK1 and 78 cm for the Simple Energy One Gen 2.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Horwin EK1 | Simple Energy One Gen 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 780 mm | 780 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,310 mm | 1,335 mm |
| Wet weight | - | 129 kg |
| Displacement | - | - |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Horwin EK1
- Sport (57.8 deg)
- Simple Energy One Gen 2
- Sport (57.8 deg)
Hip angle
- Horwin EK1
- Neutral (97.0 deg)
- Simple Energy One Gen 2
- Neutral (96.5 deg)
Elbow angle
- Horwin EK1
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Simple Energy One Gen 2
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Horwin EK1
- Neutral (10.0 deg)
- Simple Energy One Gen 2
- Neutral (10.3 deg)