electric / default rider 183 cm
Horwin EK3 Plus vs SEAT MO eScooter 125 ergonomics
Horwin EK3 Plus and SEAT MO eScooter 125 have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
Horwin EK3 Plus
All contacts reached
SEAT MO eScooter 125
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Horwin EK3 Plus lists a 780 mm seat; the SEAT MO eScooter 125 lists 780 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Horwin EK3 Plus | SEAT MO eScooter 125 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 780 mm | 780 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,360 mm | 1,427 mm |
| Wet weight | - | 152 kg |
| Displacement | - | - |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Horwin EK3 Plus
- Sport (57.9 deg)
- SEAT MO eScooter 125
- Sport (58.0 deg)
Hip angle
- Horwin EK3 Plus
- Neutral (95.9 deg)
- SEAT MO eScooter 125
- Neutral (94.6 deg)
Elbow angle
- Horwin EK3 Plus
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- SEAT MO eScooter 125
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Horwin EK3 Plus
- Neutral (10.7 deg)
- SEAT MO eScooter 125
- Neutral (11.7 deg)