electric / default rider 183 cm
Horwin EK3 Plus vs Simple Energy One Gen 2 ergonomics
Horwin EK3 Plus and Simple Energy One Gen 2 land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
Horwin EK3 Plus
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
Simple Energy One Gen 2
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Horwin EK3 Plus has a 780 mm seat; the Simple Energy One Gen 2 sits at 780 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 78 cm for the Horwin EK3 Plus and 78 cm for the Simple Energy One Gen 2.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Horwin EK3 Plus | Simple Energy One Gen 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 780 mm | 780 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,360 mm | 1,335 mm |
| Wet weight | - | 129 kg |
| Displacement | - | - |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Horwin EK3 Plus
- Sport (57.9 deg)
- Simple Energy One Gen 2
- Sport (57.8 deg)
Hip angle
- Horwin EK3 Plus
- Neutral (95.9 deg)
- Simple Energy One Gen 2
- Neutral (96.5 deg)
Elbow angle
- Horwin EK3 Plus
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Simple Energy One Gen 2
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Horwin EK3 Plus
- Neutral (10.7 deg)
- Simple Energy One Gen 2
- Neutral (10.3 deg)