electric / default rider 183 cm
Horwin SK3 vs KYMCO F9 ergonomics
Horwin SK3 and KYMCO F9 have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
Horwin SK3
All contacts reached
KYMCO F9
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Horwin SK3 lists a 790 mm seat; the KYMCO F9 lists 790 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Horwin SK3 | KYMCO F9 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 790 mm | 790 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,360 mm | 1,236 mm |
| Wet weight | - | 107 kg |
| Displacement | - | - |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Horwin SK3
- Sport (57.9 deg)
- KYMCO F9
- Sport (57.6 deg)
Hip angle
- Horwin SK3
- Neutral (95.9 deg)
- KYMCO F9
- Neutral (98.8 deg)
Elbow angle
- Horwin SK3
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- KYMCO F9
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Horwin SK3
- Neutral (10.7 deg)
- KYMCO F9
- Neutral (8.8 deg)