Skip to content
Rider Height
<- Comparison guides

supermoto / default rider 183 cm

Husaberg FS 450e Supermoto vs Rieju MRT 125 SM AC ergonomics

Husaberg FS 450e Supermoto and Rieju MRT 125 SM AC have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.

Modeled fit comparison

Husaberg FS 450e Supermoto

Modeled scoreProvisional
95Comfortable

All contacts reached

Rieju MRT 125 SM AC

Modeled scoreProvisional
95Comfortable

All contacts reached

The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.

Rider fit: reaching the ground

The Husaberg FS 450e Supermoto lists a 870 mm seat; the Rieju MRT 125 SM AC lists 870 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.

Geometry snapshot

Geometry comparison for Husaberg FS 450e Supermoto and Rieju MRT 125 SM AC
SpecHusaberg FS 450e SupermotoRieju MRT 125 SM AC
Seat height870 mm870 mm
Wheelbase1,490 mm1,380 mm
Wet weight--
Displacement449 cc125 cc

Posture metrics

Knee angle

Husaberg FS 450e Supermoto
Sport (58.1 deg)
Rieju MRT 125 SM AC
Sport (57.9 deg)

Hip angle

Husaberg FS 450e Supermoto
Neutral (93.2 deg)
Rieju MRT 125 SM AC
Neutral (95.5 deg)

Elbow angle

Husaberg FS 450e Supermoto
Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Rieju MRT 125 SM AC
Relaxed (143.3 deg)

Torso lean

Husaberg FS 450e Supermoto
Neutral (12.6 deg)
Rieju MRT 125 SM AC
Neutral (11.0 deg)