supermoto / default rider 183 cm
Husaberg FS 450e Supermoto vs Rieju MRT 125 SM AC ergonomics
Husaberg FS 450e Supermoto and Rieju MRT 125 SM AC land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
Husaberg FS 450e Supermoto
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
Rieju MRT 125 SM AC
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Husaberg FS 450e Supermoto has a 870 mm seat; the Rieju MRT 125 SM AC sits at 870 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 87 cm for the Husaberg FS 450e Supermoto and 87 cm for the Rieju MRT 125 SM AC.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Husaberg FS 450e Supermoto | Rieju MRT 125 SM AC |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 870 mm | 870 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,490 mm | 1,380 mm |
| Wet weight | - | - |
| Displacement | 449 cc | 125 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Husaberg FS 450e Supermoto
- Sport (58.1 deg)
- Rieju MRT 125 SM AC
- Sport (57.9 deg)
Hip angle
- Husaberg FS 450e Supermoto
- Neutral (93.2 deg)
- Rieju MRT 125 SM AC
- Neutral (95.5 deg)
Elbow angle
- Husaberg FS 450e Supermoto
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Rieju MRT 125 SM AC
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Husaberg FS 450e Supermoto
- Neutral (12.6 deg)
- Rieju MRT 125 SM AC
- Neutral (11.0 deg)