Skip to content
Rider Height
<- Comparison guides

supermoto / default rider 183 cm

Husaberg FS 450e Supermoto vs Rieju MRT 125 SM LC ergonomics

Husaberg FS 450e Supermoto and Rieju MRT 125 SM LC land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.

Fit verdict

Husaberg FS 450e Supermoto

95Comfortable

All contacts reached

Rieju MRT 125 SM LC

95Comfortable

All contacts reached

The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.

Rider fit: reaching the ground

The Husaberg FS 450e Supermoto has a 870 mm seat; the Rieju MRT 125 SM LC sits at 870 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 87 cm for the Husaberg FS 450e Supermoto and 87 cm for the Rieju MRT 125 SM LC.

Geometry snapshot

Geometry comparison for Husaberg FS 450e Supermoto and Rieju MRT 125 SM LC
SpecHusaberg FS 450e SupermotoRieju MRT 125 SM LC
Seat height870 mm870 mm
Wheelbase1,490 mm1,405 mm
Wet weight--
Displacement449 cc125 cc

Posture metrics

Knee angle

Husaberg FS 450e Supermoto
Sport (58.1 deg)
Rieju MRT 125 SM LC
Sport (58.0 deg)

Hip angle

Husaberg FS 450e Supermoto
Neutral (93.2 deg)
Rieju MRT 125 SM LC
Neutral (95.0 deg)

Elbow angle

Husaberg FS 450e Supermoto
Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Rieju MRT 125 SM LC
Relaxed (143.3 deg)

Torso lean

Husaberg FS 450e Supermoto
Neutral (12.6 deg)
Rieju MRT 125 SM LC
Neutral (11.4 deg)