Skip to content
Rider Height
<- Comparison guides

supermoto / default rider 183 cm

Husaberg FS650E vs Rieju MRT 50 SM ergonomics

Husaberg FS650E and Rieju MRT 50 SM land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.

Fit verdict

Husaberg FS650E

95Comfortable

All contacts reached

Rieju MRT 50 SM

95Comfortable

All contacts reached

The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.

Rider fit: reaching the ground

The Husaberg FS650E has a 870 mm seat; the Rieju MRT 50 SM sits at 870 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 87 cm for the Husaberg FS650E and 87 cm for the Rieju MRT 50 SM.

Geometry snapshot

Geometry comparison for Husaberg FS650E and Rieju MRT 50 SM
SpecHusaberg FS650ERieju MRT 50 SM
Seat height870 mm870 mm
Wheelbase1,490 mm1,380 mm
Wet weight--
Displacement628 cc50 cc

Posture metrics

Knee angle

Husaberg FS650E
Sport (58.1 deg)
Rieju MRT 50 SM
Sport (57.9 deg)

Hip angle

Husaberg FS650E
Neutral (93.2 deg)
Rieju MRT 50 SM
Neutral (95.5 deg)

Elbow angle

Husaberg FS650E
Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Rieju MRT 50 SM
Relaxed (143.3 deg)

Torso lean

Husaberg FS650E
Neutral (12.6 deg)
Rieju MRT 50 SM
Neutral (11.0 deg)