Skip to content
Rider Height
<- Comparison guides

supermoto / default rider 183 cm

Husqvarna Motorcycles SM 510 R vs KTM 660 SMC ergonomics

Husqvarna Motorcycles SM 510 R and KTM 660 SMC have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.

Modeled fit comparison

Husqvarna Motorcycles SM 510 R

Modeled scoreProvisional
95Comfortable

All contacts reached

KTM 660 SMC

Modeled scoreProvisional
95Comfortable

All contacts reached

The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.

Rider fit: reaching the ground

The Husqvarna Motorcycles SM 510 R lists a 909 mm seat; the KTM 660 SMC lists 909 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.

Geometry snapshot

Geometry comparison for Husqvarna Motorcycles SM 510 R and KTM 660 SMC
SpecHusqvarna Motorcycles SM 510 RKTM 660 SMC
Seat height909 mm909 mm
Wheelbase1,496 mm1,509 mm
Wet weight--
Displacement510 cc654 cc

Posture metrics

Knee angle

Husqvarna Motorcycles SM 510 R
Sport (58.2 deg)
KTM 660 SMC
Sport (58.2 deg)

Hip angle

Husqvarna Motorcycles SM 510 R
Neutral (92.9 deg)
KTM 660 SMC
Neutral (92.8 deg)

Elbow angle

Husqvarna Motorcycles SM 510 R
Relaxed (143.3 deg)
KTM 660 SMC
Relaxed (143.3 deg)

Torso lean

Husqvarna Motorcycles SM 510 R
Neutral (12.7 deg)
KTM 660 SMC
Neutral (12.9 deg)