Skip to content
Rider Height
<- Comparison guides

supermoto / default rider 183 cm

Husqvarna Motorcycles SM 510 R vs KTM 660 SMC ergonomics

Husqvarna Motorcycles SM 510 R and KTM 660 SMC land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.

Fit verdict

Husqvarna Motorcycles SM 510 R

95Comfortable

All contacts reached

KTM 660 SMC

95Comfortable

All contacts reached

The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.

Rider fit: reaching the ground

The Husqvarna Motorcycles SM 510 R has a 909 mm seat; the KTM 660 SMC sits at 909 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 91 cm for the Husqvarna Motorcycles SM 510 R and 91 cm for the KTM 660 SMC.

Geometry snapshot

Geometry comparison for Husqvarna Motorcycles SM 510 R and KTM 660 SMC
SpecHusqvarna Motorcycles SM 510 RKTM 660 SMC
Seat height909 mm909 mm
Wheelbase1,496 mm1,509 mm
Wet weight--
Displacement510 cc654 cc

Posture metrics

Knee angle

Husqvarna Motorcycles SM 510 R
Sport (58.2 deg)
KTM 660 SMC
Sport (58.2 deg)

Hip angle

Husqvarna Motorcycles SM 510 R
Neutral (92.9 deg)
KTM 660 SMC
Neutral (92.8 deg)

Elbow angle

Husqvarna Motorcycles SM 510 R
Relaxed (143.3 deg)
KTM 660 SMC
Relaxed (143.3 deg)

Torso lean

Husqvarna Motorcycles SM 510 R
Neutral (12.7 deg)
KTM 660 SMC
Neutral (12.9 deg)