Skip to content
Rider Height
<- Comparison guides

enduro / default rider 183 cm

Husqvarna Motorcycles WR 250 vs Husqvarna Motorcycles WR300 ergonomics

Husqvarna Motorcycles WR 250 and Husqvarna Motorcycles WR300 land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.

Fit verdict

Husqvarna Motorcycles WR 250

95Comfortable

All contacts reached

Husqvarna Motorcycles WR300

95Comfortable

All contacts reached

The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.

Rider fit: reaching the ground

The Husqvarna Motorcycles WR 250 has a 986 mm seat; the Husqvarna Motorcycles WR300 sits at 985 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 99 cm for the Husqvarna Motorcycles WR 250 and 99 cm for the Husqvarna Motorcycles WR300.

Geometry snapshot

Geometry comparison for Husqvarna Motorcycles WR 250 and Husqvarna Motorcycles WR300
SpecHusqvarna Motorcycles WR 250Husqvarna Motorcycles WR300
Seat height986 mm985 mm
Wheelbase1,486 mm1,485 mm
Wet weight107 kg-
Displacement249 cc293 cc

Posture metrics

Knee angle

Husqvarna Motorcycles WR 250
Sport (58.1 deg)
Husqvarna Motorcycles WR300
Sport (58.1 deg)

Hip angle

Husqvarna Motorcycles WR 250
Neutral (93.2 deg)
Husqvarna Motorcycles WR300
Neutral (93.2 deg)

Elbow angle

Husqvarna Motorcycles WR 250
Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Husqvarna Motorcycles WR300
Relaxed (143.3 deg)

Torso lean

Husqvarna Motorcycles WR 250
Neutral (12.5 deg)
Husqvarna Motorcycles WR300
Neutral (12.5 deg)