Skip to content
Rider Height
<- Comparison guides

enduro / default rider 183 cm

Husqvarna Motorcycles WR 250 vs Yamaha WR250F ergonomics

Husqvarna Motorcycles WR 250 and Yamaha WR250F have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.

Modeled fit comparison

Husqvarna Motorcycles WR 250

Modeled scoreProvisional
95Comfortable

All contacts reached

Yamaha WR250F

Modeled scoreProvisional
95Comfortable

All contacts reached

The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.

Rider fit: reaching the ground

The Husqvarna Motorcycles WR 250 lists a 986 mm seat; the Yamaha WR250F lists 998 mm — a 12 mm difference. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.

On seat height alone, the Husqvarna Motorcycles WR 250 has the easier modeled ground reach. Load your measurements into the simulator to compare the model, then verify both motorcycles in person.

Geometry snapshot

Geometry comparison for Husqvarna Motorcycles WR 250 and Yamaha WR250F
SpecHusqvarna Motorcycles WR 250Yamaha WR250F
Seat height986 mm998 mm
Wheelbase1,486 mm1,476 mm
Wet weight107 kg-
Displacement249 cc249 cc

Posture metrics

Knee angle

Husqvarna Motorcycles WR 250
Sport (58.1 deg)
Yamaha WR250F
Sport (58.1 deg)

Hip angle

Husqvarna Motorcycles WR 250
Neutral (93.2 deg)
Yamaha WR250F
Neutral (93.3 deg)

Elbow angle

Husqvarna Motorcycles WR 250
Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Yamaha WR250F
Relaxed (143.3 deg)

Torso lean

Husqvarna Motorcycles WR 250
Neutral (12.5 deg)
Yamaha WR250F
Neutral (12.4 deg)