enduro / default rider 183 cm
Husqvarna Motorcycles WR 250 vs Yamaha WR400F ergonomics
Husqvarna Motorcycles WR 250 and Yamaha WR400F have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
Husqvarna Motorcycles WR 250
All contacts reached
Yamaha WR400F
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Husqvarna Motorcycles WR 250 lists a 986 mm seat; the Yamaha WR400F lists 991 mm — a 5 mm difference. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
On seat height alone, the Husqvarna Motorcycles WR 250 has the easier modeled ground reach. Load your measurements into the simulator to compare the model, then verify both motorcycles in person.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Husqvarna Motorcycles WR 250 | Yamaha WR400F |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 986 mm | 991 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,486 mm | 1,480 mm |
| Wet weight | 107 kg | - |
| Displacement | 249 cc | 399 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Husqvarna Motorcycles WR 250
- Sport (58.1 deg)
- Yamaha WR400F
- Sport (58.1 deg)
Hip angle
- Husqvarna Motorcycles WR 250
- Neutral (93.2 deg)
- Yamaha WR400F
- Neutral (93.3 deg)
Elbow angle
- Husqvarna Motorcycles WR 250
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Yamaha WR400F
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Husqvarna Motorcycles WR 250
- Neutral (12.5 deg)
- Yamaha WR400F
- Neutral (12.5 deg)