Skip to content
Rider Height
<- Comparison guides

enduro / default rider 183 cm

Husqvarna Motorcycles WR250 vs Yamaha WR400F ergonomics

Husqvarna Motorcycles WR250 and Yamaha WR400F land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.

Fit verdict

Husqvarna Motorcycles WR250

95Comfortable

All contacts reached

Yamaha WR400F

95Comfortable

All contacts reached

The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.

Rider fit: reaching the ground

The Husqvarna Motorcycles WR250 has a 985 mm seat; the Yamaha WR400F sits at 991 mm — a 6 mm difference. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 99 cm for the Husqvarna Motorcycles WR250 and 99 cm for the Yamaha WR400F.

That makes the Husqvarna Motorcycles WR250 the easier reach to the ground — the safer pick for shorter riders or anyone who wants both feet planted at a stop — while the Yamaha WR400F gives taller riders more legroom and a more open knee bend. Load your own height and inseam into the simulator to see exactly how each one fits you.

Geometry snapshot

Geometry comparison for Husqvarna Motorcycles WR250 and Yamaha WR400F
SpecHusqvarna Motorcycles WR250Yamaha WR400F
Seat height985 mm991 mm
Wheelbase1,485 mm1,480 mm
Wet weight--
Displacement249 cc399 cc

Posture metrics

Knee angle

Husqvarna Motorcycles WR250
Sport (58.1 deg)
Yamaha WR400F
Sport (58.1 deg)

Hip angle

Husqvarna Motorcycles WR250
Neutral (93.2 deg)
Yamaha WR400F
Neutral (93.3 deg)

Elbow angle

Husqvarna Motorcycles WR250
Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Yamaha WR400F
Relaxed (143.3 deg)

Torso lean

Husqvarna Motorcycles WR250
Neutral (12.5 deg)
Yamaha WR400F
Neutral (12.5 deg)