enduro / default rider 183 cm
Husqvarna Motorcycles WR300 vs Yamaha WR400F ergonomics
Husqvarna Motorcycles WR300 and Yamaha WR400F land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
Husqvarna Motorcycles WR300
All contacts reached
Yamaha WR400F
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Husqvarna Motorcycles WR300 has a 985 mm seat; the Yamaha WR400F sits at 991 mm — a 6 mm difference. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 99 cm for the Husqvarna Motorcycles WR300 and 99 cm for the Yamaha WR400F.
That makes the Husqvarna Motorcycles WR300 the easier reach to the ground — the safer pick for shorter riders or anyone who wants both feet planted at a stop — while the Yamaha WR400F gives taller riders more legroom and a more open knee bend. Load your own height and inseam into the simulator to see exactly how each one fits you.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Husqvarna Motorcycles WR300 | Yamaha WR400F |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 985 mm | 991 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,485 mm | 1,480 mm |
| Wet weight | - | - |
| Displacement | 293 cc | 399 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Husqvarna Motorcycles WR300
- Sport (58.1 deg)
- Yamaha WR400F
- Sport (58.1 deg)
Hip angle
- Husqvarna Motorcycles WR300
- Neutral (93.2 deg)
- Yamaha WR400F
- Neutral (93.3 deg)
Elbow angle
- Husqvarna Motorcycles WR300
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Yamaha WR400F
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Husqvarna Motorcycles WR300
- Neutral (12.5 deg)
- Yamaha WR400F
- Neutral (12.5 deg)